How safety works at Wrati

What happens when you submit a safety report, how decisions are made, and what we deliberately do not do.

From report to decision

Every stage has a name, and the names matter. A report is not a finding, and a finding is not a conviction.

01
Report
Someone submits a safety report about content or behaviour. Reporting is available in-product and through the grievance route.
02
Allegation
The report is recorded as an allegation — an account of what someone experienced. At this stage nothing has been established.
03
Safety Review
The allegation is reviewed against Wrati's policies, alongside any evidence submitted and relevant platform signals.
04
Moderation Decision
A decision is recorded: no action, a warning, a content removal, a restriction, or account suspension — proportionate to what the review found.
05
Appeal
A decision can be contested. A self-service appeals flow is not yet built; until it is, the grievance route reaches a person who can review the outcome.

What a decision can be

No actionThe review does not find a policy violation.

Content removalSpecific content breaches the guidelines.

WarningA first or minor policy violation.

Feature restrictionRepeated violations, or behaviour that needs limiting while a review continues.

Account suspensionSerious or repeated policy violations.

What we deliberately do not do

We do not publicly label people. Wrati does not describe any member as dangerous, criminal, a scammer or abusive. A report is an allegation, and publishing an unproven allegation about an identifiable person causes real harm — including to people who turn out to have done nothing wrong.
Community trust signals are not public reviews. Wrati does not operate an open feed where members post accusations about each other. An uncontrolled accusation system is the fastest route from a safety feature to a harassment tool, and it punishes the people least able to defend themselves.
We do not claim to catch everything. Automated screening reduces harm; it does not eliminate it. Verification confirms a likeness, not a person's intentions.

If you need help now

If you are in immediate danger, contact your local emergency services first. For anything on the platform:

Submit a safety report Safety centre

Our Grievance Officer is reachable at gm@wrati.com, 10:00 – 14:00 IST, daily.

Security Privacy rights

From report to decision

Every stage has a name, and the names matter. A report is not a finding, and a finding is not a conviction.

Report

Someone submits a safety report about content or behaviour. Reporting is available in-product and through the grievance route.

Allegation

The report is recorded as an allegation — an account of what someone experienced. At this stage nothing has been established.

Safety Review

The allegation is reviewed against Wrati's policies, alongside any evidence submitted and relevant platform signals.

Moderation Decision

A decision is recorded: no action, a warning, a content removal, a restriction, or account suspension — proportionate to what the review found.

Appeal

A decision can be contested. A self-service appeals flow is not yet built; until it is, the grievance route reaches a person who can review the outcome.

What a decision can be

No actionThe review does not find a policy violation.

Content removalSpecific content breaches the guidelines.

WarningA first or minor policy violation.

Feature restrictionRepeated violations, or behaviour that needs limiting while a review continues.

Account suspensionSerious or repeated policy violations.

What we deliberately do not do

We do not publicly label people. Wrati does not describe any member as dangerous, criminal, a scammer or abusive. A report is an allegation, and publishing an unproven allegation about an identifiable person causes real harm — including to people who turn out to have done nothing wrong.

Community trust signals are not public reviews. Wrati does not operate an open feed where members post accusations about each other. An uncontrolled accusation system is the fastest route from a safety feature to a harassment tool, and it punishes the people least able to defend themselves.

We do not claim to catch everything. Automated screening reduces harm; it does not eliminate it. Verification confirms a likeness, not a person's intentions.